Did you see this article on gifted education in a recent issue of the Boston Globe? Though oddly titled, it did a good job of making a case for why the needs of gifted students should be a national priority. Here are a couple of the money quotes:
Even among Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth participants, the Vanderbilt researchers have previously found that those who weren’t challenged in school were less likely to live up to the potential indicated by their test scores.
and
But if the study is right that exceptional youthful ability really does correlate directly with exceptional adult achievement, then these talented young kids aren’t just a challenge for schools and parents: they’re also demonstrably important to America’s future. And it means that if, in education, we focus on steering all extra money and attention toward kids who are struggling academically, or even just to the average student, we risk shortchanging the country in a different way.
We don’t see this kind of article in the mainstream press nearly often enough. At any rate, the article got me thinking about a post that I originally published on the Chicago Moms Blog in November of 2009. I’m reposting as part of my Gifted Education Throwback Thursday series.
Gifted Kids and Skinny Dipping in the School Pool
Back in the 1950s when my dad was a student in a Chicago Public School, the naked truth was that the boys went swimming in the buff during PE class. As Mark Brown described in a recent column in the Chicago Sun-Times, “This was an organized school activity where gym teachers would order their students to take off their clothes and get in the pool for swimming instruction.”
I remember my father telling my brother and I such things every time we drove past Lane Tech on the North Side. As a modest child, skinny dipping sounded odd enough, but swimming naked alongside your classmates?Unthinkable.
Now that I’m a wizened adult the whole idea sounds completely whacked. Eventually others must have agreed; the practice was abolished. According to Brown it faded away during the mid-1970s, but it’s still hard for me to fathom how it remained in place for so long. I realize that moms back then weren’t searching the Internet for convicted pedophiles in their neighborhood, background checks were unheard of, and they likely never gave their children the good touch/bad touch talk, but still something about a pool–a school pool, no less– full of naked teenage boys just seems weird. I’d think it would take less than two decades for someone to speak up.
Then again, I attended school in an era when anyone and everyone had free and open access to our buildings and the students within. My gosh, we’d never even heard the term lockdown, let alone practice one. And (hold onto your chair) my brother and I slept over at a teacher’s house.
I suppose that at some point we’ll look back at today’s gifted education standards and shake our heads in amazement. A national education policy that ignored our most competent and highest performing students? What were we thinking? Now that I’m reflecting on it, that may cause even more embarrassment than boys without bathing suits.
Gail Post, Ph.D. says
March 28, 2014 at 12:55 pmGreat analogy about how absurd the approach to gifted ed SHOULD seem to everyone. Unfortunately, as we know, so many schools ignore and these children. Thanks for all of your work.
Gail Post, Ph.D./ http://www.giftedchallenges.com